The Record - for physicians and other health care providers to share with their office staffs

Forward to a friend  |  Subscribe  |  The Record Archive  |  Contacts  |  bcbsm.com  |  Print this article

September 2016

Billing chart: Blues highlight medical, benefit policy changes

You’ll find the latest information about procedure codes and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan billing guidelines in the following chart.

This billing chart is organized numerically by procedure code. Newly approved procedures will appear under the New Payable Procedures heading. Procedures for which we have changed a billing guideline or added a new payable group will appear under Updates to Payable Procedures. Procedures for which we are clarifying our guidelines will appear under Policy Clarifications. New procedures that are not covered will appear under Experimental Procedures.

You will also see that descriptions for the codes are no longer included. This is a result of recent negotiations with the AMA on use of the codes.

We will publish information about new BCBS groups or changes to group benefits under the Group Benefit Changes heading.

For more detailed descriptions of the BCBSM policies for these procedures, please check under the Medical/Payment Policy tab in Explainer on web-DENIS. To access this online information:

  • Log in to web-DENIS.
  • Click on BCBSM Provider Publications & Resources.
  • Click on Benefit Policy for a Code.
  • Click on Topic.
  • Under Topic Criteria, click on the drop-down arrow next to Choose Identifier Type and then click on HCPCS Code.
  • Enter the procedure code.
  • Click on Finish.
  • Click on Search.
Code* BCBSM changes to:
Basic Benefit and Medical Policy, Group
Variations Payment Policy, Guidelines
NEW PAYABLE PROCEDURES

Q4147, Q4149, Q4161, Q4164, Q4165

No changes: 15271, 15272, 15273, 15274, 15275, 15276, 15277, 15278, 15777, A6010, A6011, A6021, A6022, A6023, Q4100, Q4101, Q4102, Q4103, Q4104, Q4105, Q4106, Q4107, Q4108, Q4110, Q4114, Q4116, Q4117, Q4118, Q4119, Q4120, Q4121, Q4124, Q4127, Q4129, Q4130, Q4131, 4135, Q4136, Q4158

Basic benefit and medical policy

Skin and tissue substitutes

The safety and effectiveness of skin and tissue substitutes approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration have been established for patients meeting specified selection criteria. They may be useful therapeutic options when indicated.

Human tissue products are subject to the rules and regulations of banked human tissue by the American Association of Tissue Banks.

Alloderm® is a human tissue product that is established for use in breast reconstruction and treatment of severe burns.

Theraskin® is a human tissue product that is established for use in standard therapeutic compression for venous stasis ulcers and standard diabetic foot ulcer care for neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers.

GraftJacket® Regenerative Tissue Matrix-Ulcer Repair is a human tissue product that is established for the treatment of neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers.

EpiFix® is an amniotic membrane allograft that is established for the treatment of neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers and venous stasis ulcers that have failed to respond to conservative measures.

Human tissue products other than Alloderm, Theraskin, GraftJacket and EpiFix are considered experimental.

Inclusions:

The following skin and tissue substitutes are considered established because they have been approved by the FDA. This list may not be all-inclusive:

  • Apligraft®
  • Biobrane®
  • Dermagraft®
  • Endoform Dermal Template™
  • Epicel® has FDA Humanitarian Device Approval
  • E-Z Derm™
  • Hyalomatrix®
  • Integra® Bilayer Matrix
  • Integra® Dermal Regeneration Template
  • Integra® Flowable Wound Matrix
  • MatriStem® Burn Matrix
  • MatriStem® MicroMatrix™
  • MatriStem® Wound Sheet
  • MediSkin®
  • Oasis® Burn Matrix
  • Oasis® Ultra Tri-Layer Wound Matrix
  • Oasis® Wound Matrix
  • OrCel®
  • Permacol™
  • PriMatrix™
  • Strattice™
  • SurgiMend®
  • Talymed™
  • TenoGlide™
  • Unite® Biomatrix

Application of bioengineered skin substitutes will be covered when the following conditions are met and documented as appropriate for the individual patient:

  • Presence of neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers for greater than four weeks’ duration.
  • Presence of venous stasis ulcers of greater than three months’ duration that have failed to respond to documented conservative measures for greater than two months’ duration.
  • Presence of neuropathic diabetic foot ulcers that have failed to respond to documented conservative measures for greater than one month’s duration. These measures must include appropriate steps to off-load pressure during treatment.
  • Presence of partial or full-thickness ulcers.
  • Measurements of the initial ulcer size, the size following cessation of any conservative management and the size at the beginning of skin substitute treatment. In all cases, the ulcer must be free of infection and underlying osteomyelitis. Documentation must be provided that these conditions have been successfully treated and resolved before instituting skin substitute treatment.

Exclusions:

  • Any product not approved by the FDA as a skin or tissue substitute.
  • Any indication other than that approved by the FDA.
  • Human-derived skin and tissue products other than Alloderm, Theraskin, GraftJacket and EpiFix for the approved indications.
UPDATES TO PAYABLE PROCEDURES

78459, 78491, 78492

Basic benefit and medical policy

Cardiac PET scanning

The safety and effectiveness of cardiac PET scanning have been established. It may be considered a useful diagnostic option for patients meeting specified selection criteria.

An exclusion has been added, effective Sept. 1, 2016.

Payment policy
This service is subject to the radiology management program, when applicable.

Inclusions:

Cardiac PET scanning is established for the following indications:

  • Assessing myocardial perfusion for diagnosing coronary artery disease in patients with indeterminate SPECT scan
  • For patients for whom SPECT could be reasonably expected to be suboptimal in quality on the basis of body habitus (e.g., BMI > 40, large breasts, breast implants, mastectomy, chest wall deformity, pleural or pericardial effusion)
  • For assessing the myocardial viability in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction as a technique to determine candidacy for a revascularization procedure
  • For diagnosing cardiac sarcoidosis in patients who are unable to undergo MRI scanning. Examples of patients who are unable to undergo MRI include patients with pacemakers, automatic implanted cardioverter-defibrillators or other metal implants.

Exclusions:

  • Quantification of myocardial blood flow in patients diagnosed with CAD.

61850, 61863, 61864, 61867, 61868, 61880, 61885, 61886, 61888, 95970, 95978, 95979

Investigational/not medically necessary: 64999

Basic benefit and medical policy

Unilateral deep brain stimulation of the thalamus

The safety and effectiveness of unilateral deep brain stimulation of the thalamus are established. It may be considered a useful therapeutic option in patients with disabling, medically unresponsive tremor due to essential tremor or Parkinson’s disease.

The safety and effectiveness of bilateral deep brain stimulation of the thalamus have been established. It may be considered a useful therapeutic option in patients with disabling, medically unresponsive tremor in both limbs due to essential tremor or Parkinson disease.

The safety and effectiveness of unilateral or bilateral deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus and subthalamic nucleus have been established. It may be considered a useful therapeutic option in patients with medically refractory Parkinson’s disease, essential tremor or primary dystonia.

Deep brain stimulation for other movement disorders, including tremors associated with multiple sclerosis, post-traumatic dyskinesia and tardive dyskinesia, is considered investigational. The safety and effectiveness of this treatment for these conditions have not been established.

Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of other psychiatric or neurologic disorders, including Tourette syndrome, depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, Alzheimer disease, anorexia nervosa, alcohol addiction, chronic pain, epilepsy and chronic cluster headaches, is considered investigational. The safety and effectiveness of this treatment for these conditions have not been established.

The inclusionary and exclusionary criteria have been updated, effective Sept. 1, 2016.

Inclusions:
Unilateral deep brain stimulation of the thalamus may be indicated in patients with disabling, medically unresponsive tremor due to essential tremor or Parkinson’s disease.

Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the thalamus may be indicated in patients with disabling, medically unresponsive tremor in both upper limbs due to essential tremor or Parkinson disease.

Unilateral or bilateral deep brain stimulation of the globus pallidus or subthalamic nucleus may be indicated in the following patients:

  • Those with Parkinson disease with all the following:
    • A good response to levodopa.
    • A minimal score of 30 points on the motor portion of the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale when the patient has been without medication for approximately 12 hours.
    • Motor complications not controlled by pharmacologic therapy.
  • Patients older than 7 with chronic, intractable (drug refractory) primary dystonia, including generalized or segmental dystonia, hemidystonia and cervical dystonia (torticollis).

Disabling, medically unresponsive tremor is defined as all of the following:

  • Tremor causing significant limitation in daily activities
  • Inadequate control by maximal dosage of medication for at least three months before implant

Exclusions:

  • Deep brain stimulation for other movement disorders, including multiple sclerosis, post-traumatic dyskinesia and tardive dyskinesia.
  • Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of chronic cluster headaches.
  • Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of other psychiatric or neurologic disorders, including Tourette syndrome, depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, Alzheimer disease, anorexia nervosa, alcohol addiction, chronic pain and epilepsy.
  • Movement disorders from other causes not noted above.
  • Patients who have cognitive impairments, such as patients who have dementia that may interfere with the ability to cooperate.
  • Inability to comply and participate with the treatment plan.
  • Patients who are not good surgical risks because of unstable medical problems or because of the presence of a cardiac pacemaker.
  • Patients who have medical conditions that require repeated MRI.
  • Patients who have had botulinum toxin injections within the last six months.

33215-33218, 33220, 33223, 33230, 33231, 33240, 33241, 33243, 33244, 33249, 33262-
33264, 33270-33273, 93260, 93261, 93282-93284, 93287, 93289, 93295, 93296

Basic benefit and medical policy

Automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator and electronic surveillance of the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator

The safety and effectiveness of an automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator, or ICD, and electronic surveillance of the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator, or AICD, have been established. It may be considered a useful therapeutic option for patients who meet selection criteria.

The safety and effectiveness of a subcutaneous automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator and electronic surveillance of the AICD have been established. It may be considered a useful therapeutic option for patients who meet selection criteria.

Inclusionary criteria have been updated, effective Sept. 1, 2016.

Inclusions:

Standard automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillators

I. Adults

The use of the automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator, or ICD, may be considered established in adults who meet the following criteria:

Primary prevention

Inclusions:

  • Ischemic cardiomyopathy with New York Heart Association functional Class II or Class III symptoms, a history of myocardial infarction at least 40 days before ICD treatment, and left ventricular ejection fraction of 35 percent or less
  • Ischemic cardiomyopathy with NYHA functional Class I symptoms, a history of myocardial infarction at least 40 days before ICD treatment and left ventricular ejection fraction of 30 percent or less.
  • Nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy and left ventricular ejection fraction of 35 percent or less, after reversible causes have been excluded, and the response to optimal medical therapy has been adequately determined.
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, or HCM, with one or more major risk factors for sudden cardiac death (history of premature HCM-related sudden death in one or more first-degree relatives younger than 50 years; left ventricular hypertrophy greater than 30 mm; one or more runs of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia at heart rates of 120 beats per minute or greater on 24-hour Holter monitoring; prior unexplained syncope inconsistent with neurocardiogenic origin) and judged to be at high risk for sudden cardiac death by a physician experienced in the care of patients with HCM.
  • Diagnosis of any one of the following cardiac ion channelopathies and considered to be at high risk for sudden cardiac death:
    • Congenital long QT syndrome
    • Brugada syndrome
    • Short QT syndrome
    • Catecholaminerigic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia

Exclusions:

The use of the ICD is considered experimental in primary prevention patients who:

  • Have had an acute myocardial infarction (i.e., less than 40 days before ICD treatment)
  • Have New York Heart Association class IV congestive heart failure (unless patient is eligible to receive a combination cardiac resynchronization therapy ICD device)
  • Have had a cardiac revascularization procedure in past three months (coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty) or are candidates for a cardiac revascularization procedure
  • Have noncardiac disease that would be associated with life expectancy less than one year

Secondary prevention

Inclusions:

  • Patients with a history of a life-threatening clinical event associated with ventricular arrhythmic events such as sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia after reversible causes (e.g., acute ischemia) have been excluded before qualifying for the service.

Exclusions:

The use of the ICD is considered experimental for all other indications.

II. Pediatrics

Inclusions:

The use of the ICD may be considered established in children who meet any of the following criteria:

  • Survivors of cardiac arrest, after reversible causes have been excluded.
  • Symptomatic, sustained ventricular tachycardia in association with congenital heart disease in patients who have undergone hemodynamic and electrophysiologic evaluation.
  • Congenital heart disease with recurrent syncope of undetermined origin in the presence of either ventricular dysfunction or inducible ventricular arrhythmias.
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, or HCM, with one or more major risk factors for sudden cardiac death (history or premature HCM-related sudden death in one or more first-degree relatives younger than 50 years old; massive left ventricular hypertrophy based on age-specific norms; prior unexplained syncope inconsistent with neurocardiogenic origin) and judged to be at high risk for sudden cardiac death by a physician experienced in the care of patients with HCM.
  • Diagnosis of any one of the following cardiac ion channelopathies and considered to be at high risk for sudden cardiac death:
    • Congenital long QT syndrome
    • Brugada syndrome
    • Short QT syndrome
    • Catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia

Exclusions:

The use of the ICD is considered experimental for all other indications in pediatric patients.

Subcutaneous automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillators

FDA-approved subcutaneous cardioverter-defibrillators are established for adult or pediatric people who meet patient selection criteria for an implanted cardioverter-defibrillator and do not need pacing and the placement of a conventional AICD is precluded due to any of the following conditions:

  • Poor vascular access secondary to dialysis or other vascular conditions
  • A high risk for infection, e.g., immune-compromised patients or those with a history of a previous transvenous infection
  • History of congenital heart disease with anatomic limitations for transvenous placement of the AICD

S3861, 81280, 81281, 81282, 81405, 81408, 81479

Basic benefit and medical policy

Genetic testing for cardiac ion channelopathies

The genetic testing for cardiac ion channelopathies policy has been updated. This policy is effective Sept. 1, 2016.

The safety and effectiveness of genetic testing for cardiac ion channelopathies have been established. It may be considered a useful diagnostic option when indicated for patients meeting specified guidelines.

Genetic testing for LQTS syndrome

Inclusions (must meet one):

  • Individual is the index case and also a plan member
  • Patients with a confirmed prolonged QT interval, or other symptoms of LQTS but a definitive diagnosis cannot be made without genetic testing. This includes individuals who don’t meet the clinical criteria for LQTS (i.e., those with a Schwartz score < 4 [see medical policy] but have a moderate-to-high pretest probability based on the Schwartz score or other clinical criteria, including a family history positive for sudden death at an age younger than 30 or a clinical diagnosis of LQTS in a family member without a known mutation.
  • People who don’t meet the clinical criteria for LQTS themselves (they are asymptomatic) but who have one of the following circumstances:
    • A close relative (i.e., first-, second- or third-degree relative) with a known LQTS genetic mutation
    • A close relative diagnosed with LQTS by clinical means whose genetic status is unknown, for any reason
    • Prenatal testing of a fetus (i.e., amniocentesis or chorionic villus sampling) when the LQTS gene mutation variant has been identified in an affected parent

Exclusions:

  • Genetic testing for LQTS isn’t intended to be used for predicting prognosis or directing therapy.
  • Some cases of LQTS are associated with deletions or duplications of genes. These types of mutations may not be identified by gene sequence analysis and may be identified by chromosomal microarray analysis, also known as array comparative genomic hybridization. However, chromosomal microarray analysis for LQTS is considered experimental.
  • Genetic screening for LQTS of any variant in the general population. Such screening is considered not medically necessary or of unproven benefit.

Genetic testing for Brugada syndrome

Inclusions:

Individuals who don’t have an established clinical diagnosis of Brugada syndrome, but who have one of the following:

  • A close relative (i.e., a first-, second- or third-degree relative) with a known Brugada mutation in the SCN5A gene located on chromosome 3.
  • A close relative diagnosed with Brugada syndrome by clinical means whose genetic status is unknown (for any reason).
  • Signs or symptoms indicating a moderate to high pretest probability of Brugada syndrome in a structurally normal heart with no evidence of atherosclerotic coronary artery disease evidenced by both a:
    • Right bundle branch block pattern in the electrocardiogram plus a transient or persistent ST-segment elevation in leads V1-V3 for which there is no acquired cause (including previous MI, hypertension, cardiomyopathy, bacterial infection, hyperthyroidism, pulmonary embolism, etc.), and
    • Personal history of syncope or successfully resuscitated sudden cardiac death or a history of syncope or sudden cardiac death In a close relative.

Exclusions:

  • Genetic testing in patients with known Brugada syndrome.
  • Genetic testing isn’t intended to be used for predicting prognosis or directing therapy.
  • Genetic screening for Brugada syndrome in the general population. Such screening is considered not medically necessary or of unproven benefit.

Genetic testing for catecholaminergic polymorphic  ventricular tachycardia, or CPVT

Inclusions:

  • Genetic testing to confirm a diagnosis of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, or CPVT, may be considered established when signs or symptoms of CPVT are present, but a definitive diagnosis can’t be made without genetic testing.
  • Genetic testing of asymptomatic individuals to determine future risk of CPVT may be considered established when at least one of the following criteria is met:
    • A close relative (i.e., first-, second- or third-degree relative) with a known CPVT mutation.
    • A close relative diagnosed with CPVT by clinical means whose genetic status is unavailable.

Exclusions:

  • All other situations when the above criteria aren’t met.

Genetic testing for short QT syndrome

Inclusions:

  • Individual is the index case and also a plan member.
  • Genetic testing of asymptomatic individuals to determine future risk of short QT syndrome when patients have a close relative (i.e., first-, second- or third-degree relative) with a known short QT syndrome mutation.

Exclusions:

  • Genetic testing for short QT syndrome for all other situations not meeting the criteria outlined above.
33361, 33362, 33363, 33364, 33365, 33366, 33367, 33368, 33369

Basic benefit and medical policy

Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis

The transcatheter aortic valve implantation for aortic stenosis policy has been updated. This policy is effective Sept. 1, 2016.

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement performed with an FDA-approved transcatheter heart valve system, performed via an approach consistent with the device’s FDA-approved labeling, may be indicated for patients with aortic stenosis.

Inclusions:

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a device approved by the FDA performed via an approach consistent with the device’s FDA-approved labeling is established for patients with aortic stenosis when all of the following conditions are present:

  • Severe aortic stenosis with a calcified aortic annulus
  • New York Heart Association heart failure class II, III or IV symptoms.
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction greater than 20 percent
  • Patient isn’t an operable candidate for open surgery, as judged by at least two cardiovascular specialists including a cardiac surgeon.
  • Patient is an operable candidate but is at high risk for open surgery (i.e., Society of Thoracic Surgeons operative risk score ≥ 8% or at a ≥ 15 percent risk of mortality at 30 days).

Edwards SAPIEN XT transcatheter heart valve:

  1. Severe aortic stenosis with a calcified aortic annulus and one or more of the following:
    • An aortic valve area of ≤ 1.0 cm² or aortic valve area index ≤ 0.6 cm2/m2
    • A mean aortic valve gradient ≥ 40 mmHg
    • A peak aortic-jet velocity ≥ 4.0 m/sec
    • Native anatomy appropriate for the 23, 26, or 29 mm valve system (between 18 and 28 mm)
  1. New York Heart Association heart failure Class II, III or IV symptoms
  2. Patient is not a candidate for open surgery, as judged by a heart team, including a cardiac surgeon, or to be at high or greater risk for open surgical therapy (i.e., Society of Thoracic Surgeons operative risk score ≥ 8% or at a ≥ 15% risk of mortality at 30 days).

Medtronic CoreValve™ (Evolut) system:

  1. Severe aortic stenosis with a calcified aortic annulus and one or more of the following:
    • An aortic valve area of ≤ 1.0 cm² OR aortic valve area index ≤ 0.6 cm2/m2
    • A mean aortic valve gradient ≥ 40 mmHg
    • A peak aortic-jet velocity ≥ 4.0 m/sec
    • Native aortic annulus diameters between 23 and 31 mm
  1. New York Heart Association heart failure Class II, III or IV symptoms
  2. Patient is judged by a heart team, including a cardiac surgeon, to be at extreme risk or inoperable for open surgical therapy (predicted risk of operative mortality and/or serious irreversible morbidity ≥ 15% at 30 days).

Exclusions:

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement is considered experimental for all other indications, including but not limited to:

  • Patients with a degenerated bio-prosthetic valve (“valve-in-valve” implantation)
  • The individual is an appropriate candidate for the standard, open surgical approach but has refused.
  • Hypersensitivity or contraindication to an anticoagulation/antiplatelet regimen
  • Presence of active bacterial endocarditis or other active infections
  • Non-FDA-approved systems

Relative contraindications:

In some cases, the benefits of transcatheter aortic valve implantation may exceed potential risks. In such instances, the cardiologist should provide an attestation indicating that a relative contraindication exists and that the patient fully understands all risks. While the items below are not absolute exclusions, the safety and effectiveness of transcatheter aortic valve implantation have not been evaluated in patients with the following characteristics or co-morbidities:

  • Patients without aortic stenosis
  • Untreated, clinically significant coronary artery disease requiring revascularization
  • Cardiogenic shock manifested by low cardiac output, vasopressor dependence, or mechanical hemodynamic support
  • Transarterial access not able to accommodate an 18-Fr sheath
  • Sinus of valsalva anatomy that would prevent adequate coronary perfusion
  • End-stage renal disease requiring chronic dialysis or creatinine clearance <20 cc/min
  • Symptomatic carotid or vertebral artery disease
  • Safety, effectiveness and durability have not been established for valve-in-valve procedure
  • Non-calcified aortic annulus
  • Severe ventricular dysfunction with ejection fraction < 20 percent
  • Congenital unicuspid or congenital bicuspid aortic valve
  • Mixed aortic valve disease (aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation with predominant aortic regurgitation > 3+)
  • Pre-existing prosthetic heart valve or prosthetic ring in any position
  • Severe mitral annular calcification, severe mitral insufficiency, moderate to severe mitral or tricuspid regurgitation, or Gorlin syndrome
  • Moderate to severe mitral stenosis
  • Blood dyscrasias defined as: leukopenia, acute anemia (Hb < 9 g/dL), thrombocytopenia, history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy or hypercoagulable states
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with or without obstruction
  • Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation
  • Excessive calcification of vessel at access site
  • Bulky calcified aortic valve leaflets in close proximity to coronary ostia
  • The safety and effectiveness of the Medtronic CoreValve™ system have not been evaluated in the pediatric population.

Established: 91200

Investigational: 0001M, 0002M, 0003M, 76498, 81599, 84999

Basic benefit and medical policy

Noninvasive techniques for the evaluation and monitoring of patients with chronic liver disease

The noninvasive techniques for the evaluation and monitoring of patients with chronic liver disease policy have been updated. The effective date is Sept.  1, 2016.

The safety and effectiveness of transient elastography, using either M or XL Probe, for the evaluation or monitoring of patients with chronic liver disease have been established. It may be considered a useful diagnostic option when indicated.

The use of other noninvasive imaging, including magnetic resonance elastography, acoustic radiation force impulse imaging, or real-time tissue elastography, is considered investigational for the evaluation or monitoring of patients with chronic liver disease. While these services may be safe, their clinical utility in this clinical indication has not been determined.

The peer reviewed medical literature has not demonstrated the clinical utility of multianalyte assays with algorithmic analyses for the evaluation or monitoring of patients with chronic liver disease. Therefore, these services are investigational.

Inclusions:

  • Transient elastography, using either the M or XL Proble, for the evaluation or monitoring of chronic liver disease

Exclusions:

Noninvasive imaging techniques:

  • Transient elastography in individuals with ascites
  • Magnetic resonance elastography, acoustic radiation force impulse imaging and real-time tissue elastography for the evaluation or monitoring of chronic liver disease

Multianalyte assays:

  • Multianalyte assays with algorithmic analyses for the evaluation or monitoring of patients with chronic liver disease.

86780, 87389, 87502, 87806, 87810, 87850

Basic benefit and medical policy

Additions to Physician Office Lab List

Procedure codes 86780, 87389, 87502, 87806, 87810 and 87850 have been added to the Physician Office Lab List and are now available in the office setting.

J9042

Basic benefit and medical policy

Payable diagnosis codes

J9042 now has additional payable diagnosis codes of:

  • Z94.81 Bone Marrow transplant status
  • Z94.84 Stem Cells transplant status

J9228

Basic benefit and medical policy

Payable diagnosis codes

Effective Nov. 1, 2015, J9228 had additional payable diagnosis codes of:

  • C43.0 Malignant melanoma of lip
  • C43.10 Malignant melanoma of unspecified eyelid, including canthus  
  • C43.11 Malignant melanoma of right eyelid, including canthus
  • C43.12 Malignant melanoma of left eyelid, including canthus
  • C43.20 Malignant melanoma of unspecified ear and external auricular canal
  • C43.21 Malignant melanoma of right ear and external auricular canal
  • C43.22 Malignant melanoma of left ear and external auricular canal

G0477

Basic benefit and medical policy

Addition to Physician Office Lab List

Procedure code G0477 has been added to the
Physician Office Lab List and is now available in the office setting.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

81401, 81404, 81405, 81406, 81407, 81408, 81479

Basic benefit and medical policy

Genetic testing for retinal dystrophies

The peer reviewed medical literature has not demonstrated the clinical utility of genetic testing for retinal dystrophies. Therefore, this service is experimental, effective Sept. 1, 2016.

43499**

** unlisted procedure used to report service

Basic benefit and medical policy

POEM as treatment for esophageal achalasia

Peroral endoscopic myotomy, or POEM, as a treatment for esophageal achalasia is experimental, effective Sept. 1, 2016. It has not been scientifically demonstrated to be as safe and effective as conventional treatment.

0421T

Basic benefit and medical policy

Aquablation of the prostate
Aquablation of the prostate is experimental. It has not been scientifically demonstrated to be as safe and effective as conventional treatment. This policy is effective Sept. 1, 2016.

0405T, 47399

Basic benefit and medical policy

Extracorporeal liver support devices

Use of extracorporeal liver support devices and all related services are experimental for all indications. There is insufficient published evidence to assess the safety and impact on health outcomes or patient management for the use of these devices.
This policy is effective Sept. 1, 2016.

No portion of this publication may be copied without the express written permission of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, except that BCBSM participating health care providers may make copies for their personal use. In no event may any portion of this publication be copied or reprinted and used for commercial purposes by any party other than BCBSM.

*CPT codes, descriptions and two-digit numeric modifiers only are copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.