The Record - for physicians and other health care providers to share with their office staffs Forward to a friend  |  Subscribe  |  The Record Archive  |  Contacts  |  bcbsm.com  |  Print this article

October 2014

Blues highlight medical, benefit policy changes

You’ll find the latest information about procedure codes and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan billing guidelines in the following chart.

This billing chart is organized numerically by procedure code. Newly approved procedures will appear under the New Payable Procedures heading. Procedures for which we have changed a billing guideline or added a new payable group will appear under Updates to Payable Procedures. Procedures for which we are clarifying our guidelines will appear under Policy Clarifications. New procedures that are not covered will appear under Experimental Procedures.

You will also see that descriptions for the codes are no longer included. This is a result of recent negotiations with the AMA on use of the codes.

We will publish information about new BCBS groups or changes to group benefits under the Group Benefit Changes heading.

For more detailed descriptions of the BCBSM policies for these procedures, please check under the Medical/Payment Policy tab in Explainer on web-DENIS. To access this online information:

  • Log in to web-DENIS.
  • Click on BCBSM Provider Publications & Resources.
  • Click on Benefit Policy for a Code.
  • Click on Topic.
  • Under Topic Criteria, click on the drop-down arrow next to Choose Identifier Type and then click on HCPCS Code.
  • Enter the procedure code.
  • Click on Finish.
  • Click on Search.
Code* BCBSM Changes to:
Basic Benefit and Medical Policy, Group
Variations Payment Policy, Guidelines
NEW PAYABLE PROCEDURES

83037

Basic Benefit and Medical Policy
Medical Policy has determined that Hemoglobin A1c testing, using an FDA-approved point of care device in the physician’s office is considered established. It may be used as an alternative to laboratory-measured hemoglobin A1c.

Hemoglobin A1c testing device for home use in  the management of diabetes is considered experimental. Its incremental benefit above home glucose monitoring has not been established. This policy is effective March 1, 2014.

96900, 96910, 96912, 96913, 96999

Basic Benefit and Medical Policy
The Light Therapy for Vitiligo Policy is established. This policy is effective Nov. 1, 2014.

Medical Policy Statement
Psoralen plus ultraviolet A, narrowband ultraviolet B  and targeted phototherapy with excimer laser, with or without the use of oral or topical medications for the treatment of vitiligo, are considered established treatments. They may be useful therapeutic options when indicated.

Inclusionary Guidelines

  • Vitiligo that is not responsive to other forms of conservative therapy (e.g., topical corticosteroids and coal or tar preparations).
  • NB-UVB and excimer laser phototherapy in individuals ≥ 3 years of age.
  • Topical PUVA can be performed in children ≥ 2 years of age when up to 20 percent of their body surface area.
  • Systemic PUVA or oral PUVA is restricted to children > 12 years who have widespread vitiligo ( ≥ 20 percent body surface area).
  • Treatment of vitiligo is restricted to the face, neck, trunk and extremities.

Exclusionary Guidelines

  • Systemic PUVA or oral PUVA is contraindicated in children < 12 years of age.
  • Treatment of vitiligo of the acral areas (fingers, palms, soles of feet)
UPDATES TO PAYABLE PROCEDURES

Established procedures
S3854, 84999

Experimental procedures
0008M, 84999

Basic Benefit and Medical Policy
Genetic Testing – Assays of Genetic Expression to Determine the Prognosis of Breast Cancer Patients
The safety and effectiveness of the use of the 21-gene reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction  assay (e.g., Oncotype DX®) to determine recurrence risk for deciding whether or not to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy have been established. It is a useful diagnostic test for determining the likelihood of distant cancer recurrence in women for patients who meet the inclusionary guidelines.

Other genetic testing for determining the likelihood of distant cancer recurrence in women are considered experimental. (Refer to exclusions below.)

Procedure code S3854 is payable when used for billing the Oncotype DX® test.

Procedure code *84999 is payable when used for billing the Oncotype DX® test for Medicare12345.

Procedure code *0008M is considered experimental when used for billing the ProSigna™ test.

Procedure code *84999 is considered experimental when used for billing for gene expression tests for breast cancer other than the Oncotype DX®.

Criteria has been updated, effective Nov. 1, 2014.

Inclusionary Guidelines (must meet all)
The use of Oncotype DX® to determine recurrence risk for deciding whether or not to undergo adjuvant chemotherapy may be considered established in women with breast cancer meeting all of the following characteristics:

  • Unilateral tumor
  • Hormone receptor positive (that is, estrogen-receptor positive or progesterone-receptor positive)
  • Human epidermal growth factor receptor2 negative
  • Tumor size 0.6-1 cm with moderate or poor differentiation or unfavorable features or tumor size larger than 1 cm
  • Node negative (lymph nodes with micrometastases less than 2 mm in size are considered node negative for this policy).
  • Who will be treated with adjuvant endocrine therapy, e.g., tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors
  • When the test result will aid the patient in making the decision regarding chemotherapy (e.g., when chemotherapy is a therapeutic option)
  • When ordered within six months after diagnosis, since the value of the test for making decisions regarding delayed chemotherapy is unknown. 

Note: The 21-gene RT-PCR assay Oncotype DX® should only be ordered on a tissue specimen obtained during surgical removal of the tumor and after subsequent pathology examination of the tumor has been completed and determined to meet the above criteria (i.e., the test should not be ordered on a preliminary core biopsy). The test should be ordered in the context of a physician-patient discussion regarding risk preferences when the test result will aid in making decisions regarding chemotherapy.

For patients who otherwise meet the above characteristics but who have multiple ipsilateral primary tumors, a specimen from the tumor with the most aggressive histological characteristics should be submitted for testing. It is not necessary to conduct testing on each tumor; treatment is based on the most aggressive lesion.

Exclusionary Guidelines

  • All other indications for the 21-gene RT-PCR assay (e.g., Oncotype DX®), including determination of recurrence risk in invasive breast cancer patients with positive lymph nodes or patients with bilateral disease, are considered experimental.
  • Use of a subset of genes from the 21-gene RT-PCR assay for predicting recurrence risk in patients with noninvasive ductal carcinoma in situ (e.g., Oncotype DX® DCIS) to inform treatment planning following excisional surgery is considered experimental.
  • The use of other gene expression assays (e.g., MammaPrint 70-gene signature, Mammostrat® Breast Cancer Test, the Breast Cancer IndexSM, the BreastOncPx™, NexCourse® Breast IHC4, Prosigna™, BreastPRS™, EndoPredict™, etc.) for any indication is considered experimental.
  • The use of gene expression assays in men with breast cancer is considered experimental.
  • The use of gene expression assays to molecularly subclassify breast cancer (e.g., BluePrint®) is considered experimental.
  • The use of gene expression assays for quantitative assessment of ER, PR and HER2 overexpression (e.g., TargetPrint®) is considered experimental.

0051T-0053T, 33975-33983, 33990-33993

Basic Benefit and Medical Policy
Total artificial hearts and implantable ventricular assist devices.

The safety and effectiveness of implantable ventricular assist devices and total artificial hearts have been established. They are useful therapeutic options for patients meeting specified selection criteria.

The safety and effectiveness of the use of a percutaneous ventricular assist device have been established for a subset of patients. They are useful therapeutic options for patients meeting specified selection criteria.

All other uses for pVADs are considered experimental. The evidence on the use of pVADs does not support the conclusion that these devices improve health outcomes for any other situations.

Criteria has been updated, effective Nov. 1, 2014.

Implantable ventricular assist devices must have FDA approval or clearance

Inclusionary Guidelines
For post-cardiotomy setting and bridge to recovery

  • For patients in the post-cardiotomy setting who are unable to be weaned off cardiopulmonary bypass.

For use as a bridge to transplantation

  • Implantable ventricular assist devices with FDA approval or clearance when used as a bridge to heart transplantation patients who are currently listed as heart transplantation candidates and not expected to survive until a donor heart can be obtained, or are undergoing evaluation to determine candidacy for heart transplantation
  • Implantable ventricular assist devices with FDA approval or clearance, including HDEs, in children 16 years of age or younger who are currently listed as heart transplantation candidates and not expected to survive until a donor heart can be obtained, or are undergoing evaluation to determine candidacy for heart transplantation.

For use of implantable ventricular assist devices with FDA approval or clearance as destination therapy

  • For patients with end-stage heart failure who are ineligible for human heart transplant and who meet the following “REMATCH Study” criteria:
    • New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class IV heart failure for >60 days, or
    • NYHA Class III/IV heart failure for 28 days, received with over 14 days’ support with intra-aortic balloon pump or dependent on IV inotropic agents, with two failed weaning attempts

In addition, patients must not be candidates for human heart transplant for one or more of the following reasons:

  • Age over 65 years
  • Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus with end-organ damage
  • Chronic renal failure (serum creatinine >2.5 mg/dL for >90 days)
  • Presence of other clinically significant condition

Exclusionary Guidelines

  • Patients not meeting the above patient selection guidelines.
  • The use of non-FDA approved or cleared ventricular assist devices. For patients under age 16, HDE approval is acceptable
  • Percutaneous ventricular assist device must be FDA-approved

Inclusionary Guidelines

  • For providing short term circulatory support for patients with severe cardiogenic shock who are unstable to the point where IABP support would not be tolerated or effective.
  • As an adjunct to percutaneous coronary intervention in the following high-risk patients:
    • Patients with a cardiac ejection fraction of less than 35 percent who are undergoing unprotected left main or last-remaining-conduit PCI.
    • Patients with three-vessel disease and ejection fraction less than 30 percent.

The Impella® 2.5 Circulatory Support System is intended for partial circulatory support using an extracorporeal bypass control unit, for periods up to six hours. It is also intended to be used to provide partial circulatory support (for periods up to six hours) during procedures not requiring cardiopulmonary bypass.

Exclusionary Guidelines

  • The use of a pVAD for any other indication not listed above.
  • Total artificial hearts (must have FDA approval or clearance)
  • Bridge to transplantation only

Inclusionary Guidelines
When used as a bridge to heart transplantation for patients with biventricular failure who have no other reasonable medical or surgical treatment options and

  • Who are ineligible for other univentricular or biventricular support devices and
  • Who are currently listed as heart transplantation candidates or undergoing evaluation to determine candidacy for heart transplantation and not expected to survive until a donor heart can be obtained

Exclusionary Guidelines

  • Patients not meeting the above patient selection guidelines
  • The use of non-FDA approved or cleared implantable ventricular assist devices or total artificial hearts
  • The use of total artificial hearts as destination therapy

83993

Basic Benefit and Medical Policy
The clinical utility of fecal calprotectin testing has been established for pediatric patients. It can be a useful option when used as an adjunctive non-invasive test for confirming a diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease and in determining if an endoscopy may be needed.

Fecal calprotectin testing in non-pediatric patients is considered experimental. Further prospective trials and the establishment of appropriate cut-off values are needed to determine the clinical utility of this testing for non-pediatric patients.

Group Variations
Payable for GM hourly and salaried enrollees, effective July 1, 2014

A9520

Basic Benefit and Medical Policy
Effective June 13, 2014, the FDA-approved LYMPHOSEEK™ (Technetium tc-99m, tilmanocept) will be recognized under NDC 52579-1695-01 when billed with procedure code A9520 along with 78195 as indicated for:

  • Lymphatic mapping with a hand-held gamma counter to assist in the localization of lymph nodes draining a primary tumor site in patients with breast cancer or melanoma.
  • Guiding sentinel lymph node biopsy, using a hand-held gamma counter in patients with clinically node negative squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.
POLICY CLARIFICATIONS

Counseling procedures
96040, S0265

Genetic test procedures
0001M-0008M, 81161, 81200-81203, 81205-81217, 81220-81229, 81235, 81240-81245, 81250-81257, 81260-81268, 81270, 81275, 81280-81282, 81290-81299, 81300- 81304, 81310, 81315- 81319, 81321-81326, 81330- 81332, 81340-81342, 81350, 81355, 81370-81379, 81380- 81383, 81400-81408, 81479, 81500, 81503, 81504, 81506-81512, 81599, 83950, 83951, 87152, 87153, 87493, 88245, 88271- 88273, G0452, G9143, S0265, S3800, S3841, S3842, S3844-S3846, S3849, S3850, S3853-S3855, S3861, S3865, S3866, S3870

 

Basic Benefit and Medical Policy
The safety and effectiveness of genetic testing and counseling services have been established. They may be considered useful diagnostic options only if the testing results are expected to establish or verify a diagnosis, initiate a treatment plan and alter the patient’s health care management.

Prenatal genetic testing by chromosomal microarray analysis is considered experimental.

Policy updates are effective Nov. 1, 2014

Group Variations
Please reference group benefits for coverage status

Inclusionary Guidelines
If there is a medical policy for a specific genetic test, that policy must be used in order to make a policy determination. For conditions that do not have a separate policy, the patient must meet the general inclusionary guidelines below.
 
Genetic testing is established only if the test has been proven valid (i.e., has regulatory agency approval [including CLIA certification] or its clinical validity and utility has been demonstrated following randomized clinical trials).

Requests for genetic testing must meet all of the following criteria:

  • After history, physical examination, pedigree analysis, genetic counseling and completion of conventional diagnostic studies, a definitive diagnosis remains uncertain, and
  • The patient displays clinical features of a genetic disease, or is at direct risk of inheriting the mutation in question (pre-symptomatic), and
  • The disease is treatable or preventable or the result of the test will directly influence the treatment being delivered to the patient, including increasing the intensity of surveillance or treatment of that disease.

Note: For carrier testing only
For non-affected patients with a confirmed family history of a gene mutation (e.g., sickle-cell trait) or for patients in certain ethnic groups with an increased risk of specific genetic conditions (e.g., Ashkenazi for those of Jewish heritage), carrier testing is appropriate to determine whether the patient possesses one copy of a gene mutation that, when present in two copies, causes a genetic disorder.

In addition to the above criteria, it is assumed that:

The patient must provide informed consent for the testing. The Michigan Public Health Code Act 368 of 1978, section 333.17020, “Genetic test; informed consent,” states that a physician or an individual to whom the physician has delegated authority to perform a selected act, task or function under section 16215 shall not order a presymptomatic or predictive genetic test without first obtaining the written, informed consent of the test subject, pursuant to this section. There are a number of components to this informed consent. Details that must be included are of this public act are available at legislature.mi.gov/(S(jrq4hpf2c1j3n045f0vejr45))/mileg.
aspx?page=getobject&objectname=mcl-333-17020
>**

Genetic counseling is strongly recommended prior to testing to explain the significance of anticipated test results except for those tests commonly performed on amniotic fluid.

For genetic testing to determine appropriateness of specified drug therapy:
Genetic testing is considered appropriate prior to initiating a drug therapy regimen if the United States Food and Drug Administration requires that a specific heritable condition be confirmed prior to starting the drug.

Exclusionary Guidelines

  • Genetic testing in the general population for patients at low risk of having a heritable condition
  • Gene expression testing with algorithmic analysis to predict cancer susceptibility or chance of cancer recurrence except for the Oncotype DX® test for breast cancer recurrence (please refer to the policy “Genetic Testing - Assays of Genetic Expression to Determine the Prognosis of Breast Cancer Patients”)
  • Genetic testing, including chromosomal microarray analysis of products of conception, to determine genetic causes of miscarriage
  • Prenatal CMA
  • Next-generation sequencing panels for cancer or other conditions
  • Whole genome or exome sequencing for any reason
  • Forensic testing for legal purposes

**BCBSM does not control this website or endorse its general contenet.

38242

Basic Benefit and Medical Policy
The inclusionary and exclusionary guidelines for the Donor Lymphocyte Infusion for Malignancies Treated with an Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplant Policy were updated. This policy is effective Nov. 1, 2014.

Inclusionary Guidelines
Donor lymphocyte infusion may be considered established following allogeneic-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation that was originally considered medically necessary for the following indications:

  • Treatment of a hematologic malignancy that has relapsed or is refractory to treatment
  • Prevention of relapse in the setting of a high risk of relapse**
  • To convert a patient from mixed to full donor chimerism.

**Settings considered high risk for relapse include T cell depleted grafts or nonmyeloablative (reduced-intensity conditioning) allogeneic HSCT.

Exclusionary Guidelines

  • Donor lymphocyte infusion following allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation that was originally considered experimental for the treatment of a hematologic malignancy.
  • Donor lymphocyte infusion as a treatment of nonhematologic malignancies following a prior allogeneic HSCT.
  • Genetic modification of donor lymphocytes.

Established procedures

44700

Basic Benefit and Medical Policy
The safety and effectiveness of exclusion of small bowel from pelvis by mesh or other prosthesis, or native tissue (e.g., bladder or omentum) have been established. It is a useful therapeutic option for a select subset of patients that require extensive abdominal radiation who are not candidates for more targeted therapies, such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy. This policy became effective May 1, 2014.

Inclusionary Guidelines
Patients undergoing radical pelvic surgery who will require postoperative radiation and  who are not appropriate candidates for targeted radiotherapy (e.g., IMRT, etc.)

61885, 61886, 64553, 64568-64570, 95970, 95974, 95975

Basic Benefit and Medical Policy
The safety and effectiveness of vagus nerve stimulation has been established. It may be considered a useful therapeutic or diagnostic option when indicated.

Non implanted and transcutaneous vagal nerve stimulators are considered experimental. Their positive impact on clinical outcomes has not been definitively demonstrated.

Exclusionary criteria have been updated, effective Nov. 1, 2014.

Inclusionary Guidelines

  • Partial-onset seizures that are refractory to conventional and newer anticonvulsant drugs
  • A history of at least four to six identifiable partial onset seizures each month
  • A diagnosis of intractable epilepsy for at least two years
  • Patients with epilepsy who experience breakthrough seizures or suffer from debilitating adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs
  • Patients with partial-onset seizures who are ineligible for epilepsy surgery or who have a history of previous epilepsy surgery that was unsuccessful in controlling the seizures
  • Patients with mental retardation or psychosis may be candidates for VNS if it is possible to measure the benefit to the recipient in spite of their comorbid condition

Exclusionary Guidelines

  • Other types of epilepsy in patients with seizures other than partial-onset seizures
  • Patients with partial-onset seizures who are candidates for epilepsy surgery
  • A progressive seizure disorder
  • Non implantable and transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation devices
  • Other disorders not listed in the inclusions, including, but not limited to:
    • Heart failure
    • Fibromyalgia
    • Depression
    • Essential tremor
    • Obesity
    • Headaches
    • Tinnitus
    • Traumatic brain injury

86304

Basic Benefit and Medical Policy
Measurements of CA-125 are established for patients meeting the patient selection guidelines.

Measurement of CA-125 is considered experimental in asymptomatic, average-risk women as a screening technique for ovarian cancer.

The inclusionary and exclusionary criteria have been updated, effective Nov. 1, 2014.

Inclusionary Guidelines (must meet one)
CA-125 testing is appropriate when used in conjunction with transvaginal ultrasound and a rectal and pelvic exam. Testing for CA-125 levels is appropriate in the following situations:

  • For patients with symptoms suggestive of ovarian cancer (i.e., women with new symptoms (bloating, pelvic or abdominal pain, difficulty eating or feeling full quickly, or urinary frequency and urgency) that have persisted for three or more weeks, where the clinician has performed a pelvic and rectal examination and suspects ovarian cancer). 
  • For use as a preoperative diagnostic aid in women with ovarian masses that are suspected to be malignant, such that arrangements can be made for intraoperative availability of a gynecological oncologist if the CA 125 is increased
  • For patients with known ovarian cancer, as an aid in the monitoring of disease, response to treatment, detection of recurrent disease, assessing value of performing second-look surgery or determining a patient’s prognosis
  • As a screening test for ovarian cancer when there is a history of hereditary cancer syndrome (a pattern of clusters of ovarian cancer within two or more generations)
  • For individual patients with other malignancies, such as endometrial cancer, in whom baseline levels of CA-125 have been shown to be elevated
  • Testing of CA-125 levels at the completion of chemotherapy as an index of residual disease
  • For monitoring a patient's response to therapy in the presence of advanced or recurrent disease. In this setting, CA-125 levels may be obtained prior to each treatment cycle.

Exclusionary Guidelines
Measurement of CA-125 is considered experimental in asymptomatic patients as a sole screening technique for ovarian cancer. Its use as a sole screening test in asymptomatic patients is considered to be an off-label use of the test.

92065, 99199**

Basic Benefit and Medical Policy
The safety and effectiveness of orthoptic training and vision therapy for specific medical conditions have been established. It may be considered a useful therapeutic option for the treatment of any of the following:

  • Amblyopia for which occlusion therapy is administered
  • Acquired esotropia that involves the use of prism adaptation prior to corrective surgery
  • Strabismus, intermittent exotropia, convergence insufficiency and accommodative deficiencies (such as accommodative insufficiency and infacility), which also involves the use of orthoptics or prisms

Orthoptic training (including “optometric vision therapy”) for the treatment of learning disabilities, dyslexia, mild traumatic brain injury and other conditions not listed above is considered experimental. It has not been scientifically demonstrated to improve patient clinical outcomes.

The policy has been updated, effective Nov. 1, 2014.

Payment Policy
**Use procedure code *99199 to report “vision therapy” (i.e., behavioral optometry or optometric vision therapy)

Inclusionary Guidelines
Office-based vergence or accommodative therapy may is considered established for patients whose symptoms of convergence insufficiency have failed to improved following a minimum of 12 weeks of home-based therapy, including, but not limited to:

  • Push-up exercises (pencil push-ups) using an accommodative target
  • Push-up exercises (pencil push-ups) with additional base-out prisms
  • Jump to near convergence exercises; stereogram convergence exercises;
  • Recession from a target, and
  • Maintaining convergence for 30-40 seconds

Conditions treated by pleoptic therapy include:

  • Accommodative dysfunction disorders (focusing problems)
  • Acquired esotropia (the turning inward of the eye) that involves the use of prism lenses prior to corrective surgery
  • Amblyopia (lazy eye) for which eye-patching therapy is being used
  • Amblyopia (poorly developed vision in one or both eyes)
  • Convergence insufficiency
  • Intermittent exotropia
  • Non-strabismus binocular dysfunction disorders (inefficient eye teaming)
  • Nystagmus (rapid, involuntary eye movement)
  • Strabismus (misalignment of the eyes)

Documentation should include the following:

  • The initial evaluation must include measurable data supporting the diagnosis in order to establish a baseline against which follow-up evaluations can be measured.
  • There should be a written treatment plan that includes the projected period of treatment.
  • There should be reasonable expectation that vision therapy will produce improvement that can be measured in a reasonable period of time. If there is no improvement after the first two months of therapy, the need for further therapy should be questioned.
  • There should be monthly re-evaluations with documentation of percentage of improvement from the start of therapy.
  • There should be written documentation of any changes in the patient’s treatment plan. All progress should be documented.
  • Vision therapy includes both office visits and a home treatment program. There should be documentation of the patient’s compliance or noncompliance.
  • Because all patients are different, each vision therapy program may differ in the number of visits per week and the total number of visits. Vision therapy programs may require from 24 to 32 visits over the course of a few months, with follow up instructions for continuing the program in the home. Vision therapy is performed in an optometrist or ophthalmologist’s office once or twice a week for a number of months with instructions for a follow-up program to continue at home.

Exclusionary Guidelines

  • Any other conditions not listed under the inclusions listed above, including but not limited to learning disabilities, dyslexia and mild traumatic head injury.
  • Orthoptic training (including “optometric vision therapy”) for the treatment of learning disabilities, dyslexia, mild traumatic brain injury and other conditions not listed above

G0453, 95940, 95941**
(add-on procedures)

Base procedures
92585, 92586, 95829, 95867, 95868, 95925, 95926, 95927, 95938, 95955

 

Non-payable procedures with intraoperative monitoring:

95907-95913, 95928-95930, 95939, 95941

Basic Benefit and Medical Policy
Intraoperative monitoring, which includes somatosensory-evoked potentials, motor-evoked potentials using transcranial electrical stimulation, brainstem auditory-evoked potentials, EMG of cranial nerves, EEG, and electrocorticography (ECoG), is established during spinal, intracranial or vascular procedures

Intraoperative monitoring of visual-evoked potentials is considered experimental.

Intraoperative monitoring of motor-evoked potentials using transcranial magnetic stimulation is considered experimental.

This policy was updated, effective Sept. 1, 2013.

Payment Policy
**Procedure code *95941 will no longer be payable. Bill service with procedure code *95940 or G0453.

Inclusionary Guidelines
The following types of intraoperative monitoring are appropriate when performed during spinal, intracranial or vascular surgeries or procedures. Note: Only qualified persons can perform this type of monitoring.

  • Somatosensory-evoked potentials
  • Motor-evoked potentials using transcranial electrical stimulation
  • Brainstem auditory-evoked potentials
  • Electromyogram of cranial nerves
  • Electroencephalogram EEG
  • Electrocorticography

Exclusionary Guidelines

  • Intraoperative monitoring of visual-evoked potentials
  • Intraoperative monitoring of motor-evoked potentials using transcranial magnetic stimulation
  • Intraoperative EMG and nerve conduction velocity monitoring during surgery on the peripheral nerves
  • Intraoperative monitoring performed during any surgical procedure not specified in the inclusions

Established procedures
A4222, A4230, A4231, A4232, A9274, E0784, J1817, K0552, K0601-K0605

Experimental procedures
99091, E1399, S9145

Basic Benefit and Medical Policy
The safety and effectiveness of external insulin pumps have been established for patients meeting specific patient selection criteria. They are useful therapeutic options when indicated.

Procedure codes 99091, E1399 and S9145 are considered experimental for the Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion and Transdormal Insulin Delivery Systems Policy.

Transdermal insulin delivery systems (e.g., V-Go Transdermal Basal-Bolus Insulin Delivery Device) are considered experimental. There is insufficient evidence in medical literature to determine if the use of these devices result in improved patient clinical outcomes. This policy is effective Nov. 1, 2014.

Inclusionary Guidelines
External infusion pumps and related drugs and supplies are established in the home setting for the treatment of diabetes in the following situations, if determined to be medically necessary and prescribed by an allopathic or osteopathic physician.

Patients must meet all the following criteria:

  • The patient must complete a comprehensive diabetes education program.
  • The patient has been on a regime of at least three injections daily with frequent self-adjustments for at least six months prior to the initiation of the pump.
  • The patient has documented the frequency of glucose self-testing on average at least four times per day during the two months prior to initiation of the insulin pump.
  • The patient also meets one of the following criteria on a multiple daily injection regimen:
    • Glycosylated hemoglobin level (HbA1c) > 7.0 percent
    • History of recurring hypoglycemia
    • Wide fluctuations in blood glucose before mealtime
    • “Dawn” phenomenon with fasting blood sugars frequently exceeding 200 mg/dL
    • History of severe glycemic excursions

For gestational diabetics, only the following criteria must be met to qualify for insulin pump therapy:

  • Insulin injections are required greater than or equal to three times per day and
  • The patient cannot be controlled by the use of intermittent dosing.

Exclusionary Guidelines

  • Patients with major psychiatric disorders such as psychosis and severe depression
  • Patients with eating disorders
  • Young children who cannot tolerate the cannula or refrain from changing pump settings
  • Patients who fail to comply with treatment regimen
  • Patients who, in the judgment of the diabetic specialist, are non-responsive to a trial of insulin pump therapy
  • Transdermal insulin delivery devices (e.g., V-Go)
J3490

Basic Benefit and Medical Policy
Verapamil is approved for the off-label treatment of Peyronie’s disease through penile injections. This policy is effective retroactive to Jan. 1, 2014. 

Report Verapamil with NOC code J3490, until a permanent code is established. 

Dosage and administration:

  • Total dose 2.5-10 mg per session given as multiple injections distributed within the plaque using 25G needle
  • Injections are usually every other week (occasional doses may be provided weekly)
  • Allow for up to 12 total injection sessions.
  • Requests for longer periods of therapy require physician review.

A standardized dose of 10 mg of verapamil (5 mg/2 cc) diluted to 10 cc total volume with injectable saline is used. Prior to drug injection, a penile block is performed with 10 cc 0.5 percent bupivacaine without epinephrine. In some cases, a second penile block may be required. The plaque is grasped between index finger and thumb, and a single skin puncture is performed. The needle is then passed in and out of the plaque while leaving the drug within the needle tracts. In men with large plaques, the needle may be removed and the process repeated. After the injections are complete, the patient is asked to lightly compress the penis with both thumbs over the puncture sites to reduce the likelihood of ecchymosis or hematoma. Each patient's blood pressure is monitored for 10 minutes after drug injection before discharge from the office. Patients are asked to abstain from intercourse for a minimum of 24 hours after each procedure.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES
86152, 86153

Basic Benefit and Medical Policy
The clinical utility of testing for the detection and quantification of circulating tumor cells has not been demonstrated. The peer reviewed medical literature has not shown that the test has sufficient diagnostic accuracy to provide clinically relevant information when compared to other available diagnostic studies. This test is considered experimental, policy effective Nov. 1, 2014.

A7002**, A7047, E0600**

Basic Benefit and Medical Policy
Negative oral pressure therapy for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea is considered experimental, effective Nov. 1, 2014. There is insufficient scientific evidence in the current medical literature to support its efficacy and use in clinical practice.

**Procedure codes A7002 and E0600 may be payable when used to report another service.

No portion of this publication may be copied without the express written permission of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, except that BCBSM participating health care providers may make copies for their personal use. In no event may any portion of this publication be copied or reprinted and used for commercial purposes by any party other than BCBSM.

*CPT codes, descriptions and two-digit numeric modifiers only are copyright 2013 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.